Saturday, 14 June 2014

Japan's Most Famous Battleship: The Yamato



The monstrous battleships of the first half of the twentieth were more than tools of national power; they constituted a nation’s strength, in both real and symbolic terms. The big warships continue to have a grip on our imagination.  2012’s Battleship performed poorly with critics and at the box office, but the eight battleships preserved around the United States continue to draw visitors.  One, the USS Wisconsin, even served as the launch-pad for Representative Paul Ryan’s ascension to GOP vice presidential candidate.
But no American battleship holds the same degree of cultural relevance as the Japanese Yamato. The largest battleship ever constructed, Yamato was completed shortly after the Pearl Harbor attack, displacing 63,000 tons, and carrying nine 18” guns.  Sunk in desperate circumstances off Okinawa in 1945, she continues to exert a hold on the popular imagination in Japan.
Although more powerful than their American counterparts (at least until the Iowa-class came into service),Yamato and Musashi were used cautiously by the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) for most of the war.  Apart from a short, frustrating engagement off Samar, neither used her main armament in anger against Allied ships. Both were lost to swarms of American carrier aircraft, Musashi at Leyte Gulf and Yamato en route to Okinawa. Yamato’s loss came in epic fashion, as her last mission involved a suicide attack against American beachheads. Over 3,000 sailors died when she exploded and sank well short of her goal.
For American audiences of a certain age, the most evocative depiction of Yamato came in the form of the animated television show “Star Blazers,” in which the Earth repurposed the hulk of Yamato to fight a series of galactic wars.  Star Blazers was an edited and redubbed version of the Japanese “Space Battleship Yamato,” which made explicit reference to the lost battleship. In a pointed reference to Japan’s wartime experience, the first alien attack comes in the form of a radioactive bombardment that leaves the surface of the earth poisonous and desolate.  Most of this escaped the notice of the American audience at the time, however.
Memory of Yamato remains alive and well in Japan. Junya Sato directed a relatively successful film on the historical Yamato in 2005.  In 2010, a live action version of “Space Battleship Yamato” performed very well in Japan, although it didn’t enjoy much cross-over success in the United States.
recent article by Shunechi Takekawa studied this issue in some depth. Yamato began appearing in Japanese film in the 1950s, and has remained a relatively popular subject for film, television, and manga since the 1970s. Takekawa argues that the stylized memory of Yamato provides a space for working out contradictory messages about Japanese nationalism, and about the historical experience of World War II.  This goes well beyond a straightforward right-wing interpretation of Japanese nationalism, as the Yamato narrative evokes complex and contradictory understandings of the war, some of which even verge into left-wing pacifism.
It perhaps shouldn’t be surprising that the colossal Yamato has become symbolic of multiple interpretations of Japan’s colonial period. Her construction represented a doomed effort to match and exceed the capabilities of the Western powers, and yet her entire career was characterized by dysfunction within the Japanese war machine.  The final destruction of Yamato evokes a vision of heroic, but also pointless and futile, sacrifice.
The bigger story, perhaps, is the enduring relevance of World War II to the construction of national identity within Asia. Not only the sheer drama, but also the machinery of the Second World War remain key mileposts in how nations define themselves.  In this context, it’s surely unsurprising that more controversial elements of the legacy of World War II (including Yakusuni) continue to embitter Japan’s relations with the rest of Asia.http://thediplomat.com/

United Bases Of America

US Military Bases Around the World

The Puma

The German PSM group, the manufacturer of the Puma armoured infantry fighting vehicle is displaying this armored vehicle at the Eurosatory exhibition following a successful series of tests demonstrating the vehicle's performance under extreme climatic conditions. Last year the Puma has undergone hot, dry testing in the UAE 2013), which followed the cold weather testing in Norway in 2012

Puma_desert725

The German PSM group, the manufacturer of the Puma armoured infantry fighting vehicle is displaying this armored vehicle at the Eurosatory exhibition following a successful series of tests demonstrating the vehicle’s performance under extreme climatic conditions. Last year the Puma has undergone hot, dry testing in the UAE2013), which followed the cold weather testing in Norway in 2012.
The vehicle’s combat performance were also evaluated during live-fire trials conducted in cooperation with experts from the Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment (BAAINBw) and the German Army.Germany’s new armoured infantry fighting vehicle combines high tactical and strategic mobility with maximum crew protection and massive firepower provided by the 30mm cannon, backed by extensive optronic, target acquisition and fire control systems.
Puma_turret_closeup_450
Among the vehicle’s unique attributes are its effective modular protection concept, a remote-control, stabilized turret armed with an ABM capable 30mm automatic cannon, and decoupled running gear with hydro-pneumatic shock absorber elements. The vehicle is powered by the newly developed MTU diesel engine developing 800 kW of power. The vehicle delivered to the Bundeswehr are fitted as ‘network-enabled warfare capabable’, provided with battle management systems and supporting ‘future soldier systems’ and digital communications equipment. In addition to their combat capabilities, the vehicles can also be operated in ‘training mode’, providing an autonomous training platform, functioning as a realistic combat simulator for crew and unit training. Multiple vehicles can also be networked, makes it
possible to connect up to four vehicles in a training formation.
Its fighting compartment offers nine cubic metres of armor protected space, enabling enough room for integration of specific mission equipment kits. These can include mobile tactical operations centres, field ambulances, armoured recovery systems or scouts.
PSM Projekt System & Management GmbH is a 50:50 partnership established by the two German leaders in combat vehicles – Krauss-Maffei Wegmann and Rheinmetall. The group was founded specifically to manage the German Puma procurement project on the contractor side.http://defense-update.com/
Puma_desert_test_2013_725

F-35 Stable, but Software Potential Long-Term Issue

The Pentagon is currently flying software block 2B on F-35 test fights, and is starting the process to load block 3I onto test flights.The F-35 program is largely on track, but software remains a concern that could lead to delays down the road, according to top Pentagon officials.

The Pentagon is currently flying software block 2B on test fights, and is starting the process to load block 3I — essentially, the same software with better hardware – onto test flights. The situation is slightly different with the 3F block of software, which will deliver the greatest capabilities for the plane and is expected in the 2018 time frame.

“Our belief is that we're about six months behind in software development there,” US Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, the head of the F-35 program office, said during Thursday conference call about the fifth-generation fighter. “That is if we don't do anything different and we don't get any better over the next two to three years in developing that software. So I have to do everything I can to work with Lockheed to ensure that we take that six months and move it back so that we don't impact anything in the future.”

The biggest challenge with 3F is the “fusion” of data, Frank Kendall, DoD undersecretary for acquisition, said.“It's merging of information from different sensor systems on the aircraft and off the aircraft, information that comes from other airplanes that's transmitted to the F-35 and then merged with its own information,” he said.

“That's a difficult processing problem, it's a difficult computational problem,” Kendall continued. “And just going through all the tests and getting the different aircraft that might need to be in a test together so that you can pull all the test off is challenging. And that's where the scheduling backup comes in."

The Navy intends to go operational with 3F, but Bogdan said the service would not necessarily hold up going operational if 3F is delayed. The Marines intend to go through IOC in 2015 with the block 2B software, while the Air Force will use the block 3I in 2016.

William LaPlante, Air Force undersecretary for acquisition, said in a Friday speech at the Atlantic Council that he was “reasonably confident” the Air Force would meet its IOC date.Kendall used the call to announce a program “blueprint for affordability,” which involves establishing incentives for industry members to encourage a “high rate of return for the government in future cost savings.”LaPlante expanded on Kendall’s comment, noting the plane “involves industry doing investment on its own and being able to get benefits of that investment, with the taxpayer and warfighter getting a cheaper airplane.”

Quantity remains the largest driver of cost savings for the program at this point, something Kendall noted in his opening comments.“Every time someone slips their buys, it increases the cost for the other partners. And we're all aware of that and we're all committed to trying to hold the line on our production plans,” he said.

“Now for the US in particular, that's a problem because of the threat of sequestration. We can't make a firm commitment to our partners that we're going to be able to do what we have asked for in our budgets because of that. And it's an unfortunate situation and one of the many negative impacts of sequestration hanging over our heads.”http://www.defensenews.com/

Wednesday, 11 June 2014

Japan, Australia eye submarine deal and closer military ties

Japan, Australia eye submarine deal and closer military ties

A huge submarine deal is on the table this week when Japan and Australia meet to shore up their military relationship, as the security architecture of the Asia-Pacific shifts to meet the challenge of a rising China.
Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida and Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera will play hosts in Tokyo on Wednesday to Julie

Bishop and David Johnston, their respective opposite numbers, for the fifth round of so-called “2+2″ talks.
High on the agenda will be discussions on the transfer of Japanese submarine technology to Australia, with Canberra needing to replace its fleet of stealth subs over the coming years at a reported cost of up to US$37 billion.
This could see Tokyo’s technology — or even entire Japanese-built vessels — used in the fleet, in a deal that would yoke the two nations together for several decades, binding their militaries with shared know-how.
The expected step comes as China’s relentless rise alters the balance of power in a region long dominated by the United States, with Beijing ever-more willing to use its might to push territorial and maritime claims.
A rash of confrontations in the South China Sea has set off ripples of disquiet in the region, as has the festering stand-off with Japan over islands in the East China Sea.
The worries have encouraged a relationship-building drive across Asia, with Australia and Japan — both key US allies — a notable pairing.
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe signed a free trade pact and a security deal in April.
Following an Australian request, Tokyo will let Johnston see Japanese submarines during his stay, Onodera said.
The Japanese defence chief also stressed that various “frameworks” — military pacts — grouping Australia, Japan, South Korea, and the United States are vital in ensuring security in East Asia.
Abe’s military push
Abe looks to nudge long-pacifist Japan towards a more active role on the global stage, including loosening restrictions on when its well-equipped armed forces can act.
He has also relaxed a self-imposed ban on weapons exports, giving its high-tech weapons makers a leg-up in the global marketplace.
Japan Inc. has hailed Abe’s promotion of the nation’s military industry, which some see as just another plank in his economic push to boost the nation’s heavy manufacturers and exporters.
However, some analysts suggest it is more nuanced.
Koichi Nakano, political science professor at Sophia University in Tokyo, says Abe’s beefing up of military industry shows the prime minister marrying his twin aims of economic and diplomatic rejuvenation.
“The Abe government may be hoping that they can have a tacit understanding with the Abbott government which is also a conservative regime,” and raise pressure on China, he said.
Observers point out that a more competitive arms industry would be more able to meet future domestic demand in the event that Japan’s military finds itself in need of more firepower.
China’s military has received double-digit budget increases for several years and analysts say its capacity is building towards its ambition of having a blue-seas navy — one that is able to push the US out of the western Pacific.
The US, in response, has looked to bolster its military capacity in the Asia-Pacific, placing or realigning troops in Australia, Japan, the Philippines, Hawaii and Guam, and trying to thread its friends together.
Abe, for his part, has courted members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), offering coastguard vessels to Vietnam and the Philippines. Both have proved willing to push back against Chinese claims in the South China Sea.
Increasingly, the outlines of a nascent coalition are becoming visible, says Takehiko Yamamoto, a security expert and emeritus professor at Waseda University.
“Naturally, Australia finds Japanese technology attractive,” he said, adding that the nation’s prowess in precision-manufacturing for the highly sophisticated submarine kit was enviable.
Tighter ties between the two US allies, both with vast coastlines, are a part of a greater “security complex”, also involving New Zealand and India, that serves to create a counterbalance to China, said Yamamoto.
“It is a part of a long-term trend,” he said.http://www.defencetalk.com/